Thủ tục nhập khẩu điện thoại di động iphone

[kim]

Hệ thống quảng cáo SangNhuong.com

Do the following:

1. Login normally to Hotmail with your ID (any id)
2. Use this type of link to view specific message from
specific user:

or


From that link change values:
MSG943322803%2e16 (Message id number, its simply a counter. %2e=.)
username (Hotmail account name to view)

(remove "%26raw%3d0" if you want to view email as 'emailbox
view', instead of full raw view.)
(remove "&hm___fl=attrd&domain=hotmail.com" if you dont
like the hotmail frame on top.)
3. Done. If you entered correct message number & that user
has it you will see it. (Test it with your own other
hotmail account messages first to get the idea working.)

Now typing those message numbers manually is too much work, you
could create a small utility to automatically scan given range of
messages from specific user name. (You need to build it to work
with IE, as you must be logged in hotmail when you want to view
messages..)

It also helps to know that from the message numbers, in you own
hotmail inbox,you can see about what time is what message number
been used. eg:

- MSG997936971.27 arrived on 16.08.2001.
- MSG996698372.27 arrived on 01.08.2001.
- MSG975960863.0 arrived on 04.12.2000.

So you dont need to scan as many message addresses when you know
from which range you are looking at.

The numbers after MSG and before the dot (ie. 997936971, 996698372
and 975960863) seem to be a UNIX timestamp which means, if we
understood this correctly, that you have to know exactly when a
message has arrived. The standard UNIX timestamp only has a
resolution of 1 second. If that is indeed what they're using,
there would only be 60 messages to scan if you knew what minute
the message came in, 3600 if you knew what hour, and 86400 if you
knew what day. If the part after the dot is hundredths-of-second
instead of a counter of messages received in the same second, it's
trickier; multiply all of the numbers above by 100.

From the above example, though, it looks more likely that it
represents some kind of status. Odds of there being 27 messages
received in the same second on two different occasions are slim,
and are odds that two messages were both received at 27/100ths of
a second are 1/100, which isn't all that likely either. How that
affected the time required for scans depends on how many statuses
there are, and how common each is.
--Typn--